Pages

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Two Spectacular Idiots

Frighteningly moronic.

One tells Zaid to apologise.

Now this idiot's stupidity has been established, and some of us have been encouraging Zorro not to hold back too much on expressing exactly how he feels about Botak.

Holding back is not good for health, and we want Zorro to live long because The Wharf would be really quiet without him.

But I digress.

Back to the tale of our idiots, the other asks Zaid to get out of Malay grouping, as if race is an option you and I get to choose.

"Zaid should repent. Otherwise, he should get out of the ’rumpun Melayu’ (Malay grouping)," Shahidan Kassim brayed loudly, much to the pleasure and approval of the other donkeys.

Curious to know who this dingbat is? He's been featured before, not merely for talking like a fool, but for acting like one. Check him out in all his glory.

He said if Zaid continued to question the Malay supremacy concept, then he should no longer be a Malay because as a Malay he should be defending the Malays and not running them down.

That's precisely why the Malays are such a regressive lot. They have allowed certain quarters to dictate what they can or cannot speak about.

No matter how stupid an argument or concept may seem, and no matter how failed it may be, it should be championed merely because one Malay heralds it as the saviour of the entire Malay race.

UMNO politicians have superior skills when it comes to flogging a dead horse, and renouncing anyone who does not blindly follow.

And so the Malays collectively dive like lemmings off the cliff.

Though I must say, there are the exceptions and thankfully, Zaid Ibrahim is not alone.

Aisehman has long been an anonymous critic of the Ketuanan Melayu concept. Unfortunately, he's just about had enough and thrown in the towel.

We also have Farish Noor, Bakri Musa and Azly Rahman, who have on various occasions, spoken against this flawed logic of superiority while feeling inferior, which is more popularly known as Ketuanan Melayu.

Both Azhar Azizan Harun and Malik Imtiaz Sarwar have their respective takes on this issue.

7 comments:

Antares said...

The three KTM stooges could be suffering from acute testosterone poisoning. Have met quite a few in that state. In fact, I'll blog about it soon. Castration may be a quick fix, but accessing their own feminine aspect is perhaps the more humane solution.

donplaypuks® said...

The intention of these 1/2, 1/3 & 1/4 Bumiputra's championing more vociferously the KTM racist agenda than the majority of Malays themselves, is the same as British Colonial Policy.

Keep the races apart. Divide and Rule. Sweep in the money for the few.

BN has succeeded in replacing one type of colonial policy with a home grown one which is even more pernicious than the British could have imagined. Just as they have misused and abused the ISA for silencing their critics.

All M'sians who believe in 1 Citizenship, 1 Malaysia, must resist these KTM bogus racist dogs at all costs, if not for our sake, then surely for that of our children!!
http://donplaypuks.blogspot.com

Crankster said...

LOL Antares. :)

donplaypuks®, that's exactly what I've been saying for a while now. But the masses don't realise the divide and rule policy is at their own detriment.

Knights Templar said...

you trying to say something to me Ms.Crank ?

Crankster said...

Am I now? :)
I wouldn't know!

walla said...

Azhar Azizan asked something interesting. If there's a contract, why the need for supremacy?

Now when you think of that, you can ask it the other way around. If there's supremacy, why the need for contract?

Either way, it's supercalifragelisticexpecalidocious.

With matters thus settled, let's consider this wild idea. At every blog in town, the politicans are categorized using just four classes. Class A to Class D. At the end of the month, the association of bloggers compile whatever categorising exercise that has been done and put it up on it website. The next month onwards, anyone will refer to it and use the class assigned to the politician for whatever new comments to be made. This classifying around adds a label and it sticks to the mind.

What is hoped is that it sticks to the mind of the politician concerned.

It ain't no fun to be called Class D (whatever that means).

Because the last one checked, Class A was already assigned to war criminals.

Take for instance a comment:

'Oh it is completely understandable. These two are not only spectacular idiots but they are Class Ds.'

Then one of those newbies will saunter in and ask 'what's Class D?'

In a conspiratorial tone, someone will offer, 'oh it's a grade below C' and leave it at that.

Soon, as campaigning gets into full swing, word will get around the guy has been a Class D. There will be renewed debate about this mysterious assignment. To-and-fro, back-and-forth.

No politician likes to be debated on, especially what he had said before.

Also, public classification without saying what it is falls outside the ambit of such things like sedition.

See, what happens to people after watching the 11am show about the day after vesper lynd expired in Venice?

walla said...

And RPK's out. Yippeekaiyea